Thursday, September 1, 2011

If someone were to be undercover for more than 5 years, is he/she really gonna stay loyal to the previous group? Or would be a turncoat? For some reason, I do feel a little sympathy for the turncoats in history, sometimes it’s really unfair to see how others accepted you, raised you, build a positive relationship with you, then just to see you turn your back against them.

For example, adopted children, I do think that their foster parents, if treated them well, should be prioritised more than their blood parents. Thus I rather disagree with the Chinese saying that blood is thicker than water.

Another one, some minority in a dynasty that was surprised by the recently dominated dynasty, will they really plot for a rebellion after 10 years or more like how they always mentioned in films and novels?

A police’s mole in a triad, after maybe few years in there, attaining high position in the triads, befriending and gained trust of many, will you really bearable to see them being betrayed by you, ofcoz these are on the condition that the triads had always been welcoming you.

How about relationship, especially long distance relationship, that had not met for 2 years or more, and lack of communication, will that ‘love’ still be around? That commitment to each other? I always wondered this, cuz I personally believed that even things such as ‘feeling of love’ is a result of many societal forces. As such, the feeling might fade, or degrade into friendship relationship, etc. To some extent, I agree with a statement quoted from the HK drama series “Shine On You” (Qing Chu Yu Lan), that love doesn’t care about sequence, it’s not on first-come-first-serve basis.

As such, to maintain a relationship, gotta communicate, gotta update each other on each other’s happening, such that they could make each other feel loved that someone can lent a ear for you to vomit your words and that the other party cared about you, willing to meddle into your problems, hand-in-hand walk through it. So, in a dying relationship, when the flame is dimming, is waivering, either gotta “add oil” (jiayou) or just let it go, after all, “the last level of love is to let go” (Lee Sheng Jie).

Its like marketing, product life cycle, in a decline stage, have to promote, modify them, reposition them. On the other hand, we can also change into new product line, upgrade product, or just keep it in stock but not emphasizing on it, in harvesting mode.

Ok, drifted too much on the topic, made me sounds like such asshole that treat women as tools. I’m just linking, no other intentions, I love to link things, in a way its often “no link”.

Next, I saw this advertisement on molesting. Suddenly, I have this thought, perhaps because I’m really out-of-the-world kindda person, how does touching of lady’s butt considered molest? And in the first place, why do men want to commit such act? Why different with men? I surveyed some people long time ago, they say that the butt felt like the sensitive part of women, but quite illogical to me. So, why molester don’t wanna touch their own butt?? Really curious. If not the reason, then why butt? Why not other parts? I think lap also considered, then hand lehh? And why?? Gotta ask perverts to find out. Felt rather pitiful that as a man I know nothing on this field or subject, when I bet lower secondary are experts, then again, its gender norms.

No comments: